Further reporting confirms resignations of Liguori and Kirsch over military deals lacking sufficient human oversight
DeepMind Researchers Quit Over Pentagon AI Contract and Gag Clauses
The resignations surface a direct conflict between Google's stated AI ethics commitments and its classified government contracts, where independent oversight of AI use is structurally limited. The non-disparagement clauses, which lack exemptions for protected disclosures, raise concerns about whether employees can safely flag safety-related issues.
The full picture
Multiple Google DeepMind researchers have resigned over the company's contract with the U.S. Department of Defense, signed in April, that permits Google's AI models to be used for 'any lawful government purpose' including classified military work. Researcher Sofia Liguori resigned after three years at the company, citing Google's increasing work with the U.S. and Israeli militaries, and spoke to the BBC despite a contractual non-disparagement clause she said forbids her from criticizing Google for the rest of her life. Researcher Andreas Kirsch also resigned. The contract prohibits use for domestic mass surveillance or autonomous weapons without appropriate human oversight, but critics argue Google has no enforcement power over how the government applies the technology in classified operations. Google defends the contract as compliant with its AI principles and states that employees have internal channels to raise concerns and that retaliation is prohibited.
How it developed
Multiple outlets report DeepMind researcher resignations over Pentagon contract and non-disparagement clauses
BBC reports on employee resignations; Liguori quoted describing loss of faith in company's stated ethical values
Sources
Want this in your inbox?
I send one email each morning with the stories that moved. If you would rather just read here, that works too.
Subscribe free