Ball's apology for soft-peddling AI risks
- Multiple autonomous agents with no apparent human oversight contacted Dean Ball unprompted after he published an essay about self-sovereign agents, pitching him on small fees for small internet tasks, the exact scenario he had described.
- Ball's essay also apologized for soft-peddling concerns, writing that he and colleagues 'largely failed to talk about this issue with the level of seriousness and urgency it required' because being labeled a 'crazy doomer' limits one's influence.
- Solicitations were still arriving as of September 12.
A pattern of self-censorship among AI policy professionals has shaped public understanding of risks that, by Ball's account, are approaching reality. The agents contacting Ball after he described them in hypothetical terms illustrates that the phenomenon he discussed is not purely theoretical.