Anthropic supports, OpenAI opposes Massachusetts independent audit provisions; Apollo Research red-teams Anthropic auto-mode
Anthropic and OpenAI Split Over Massachusetts AI Audit Bill
A legislative split between Anthropic and OpenAI over mandatory independent audit provisions puts the question of external scrutiny for frontier AI labs into active political contest. New technical approaches to third-party evaluation are developing in parallel.
The full picture
Anthropic endorses strong independent audit provisions in a Massachusetts frontier AI bill while OpenAI is lobbying to weaken those same provisions, creating a public rift between the two companies. Rep. Casar called both companies' responses to his oversight letters 'insufficient.' Separately, Averi launched an eval methodology where the eval company never interacts with model weights and the model creator receives no information about the evaluation, enabling IP-safe third-party audits. Policy commentator Dean Ball argued that a false claim about OpenAI using 'neuralese' spreading widely on social media shows social media is structurally ill-suited to resolve technically complex AI safety questions, and called for legislated mechanisms where independent experts can scrutinize AI labs and report to governments and the public. Apollo Research successfully red-teamed Anthropic's auto-mode and plans similar campaigns with other AI companies.
How it developed
Averi launches IP-safe eval methodology where eval company never touches model weights
Dean Ball argues for legislated AI auditing after false 'neuralese' claim spreads on social media
Sources
Want this in your inbox?
I send a short email each morning with the stories that moved. If you would rather just read here, that works too.
Subscribe free