Additional reporting on Epoch AI findings circulated
Epoch AI: GLM 5.3 Built Working Firefox Exploits From Unshipped Patches
An open-weight model anyone can download can autonomously convert publicly visible but unshipped browser security patches into working exploits at roughly $1,000 per attempt, with no safety refusals from providers. This compresses the window in which browser vendors can ship fixes before attackers can weaponize them.
When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.
One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.
Check your email.
I have sent you a confirmation link. One click and you are in.
Not in your inbox? Look in spam or promotions. If it's there, mark it "Not spam" so future editions land in your inbox.
The full picture
Epoch AI researchers demonstrated that Z.ai's open-weight model GLM 5.3 autonomously exploited six consecutive Firefox releases between versions 156.0 and 158.0.1 by analyzing Mozilla's public pre-release codebase, where security fixes are disguised as routine changes. The model operated without safety refusals, identified genuine patches, chained known vulnerabilities with a previously unknown memory safety flaw it discovered independently, and produced exploits capable of silently exfiltrating local files, stored passwords, and cookies when a user visited a malicious webpage. Mozilla patched the independently discovered vulnerability in Firefox 159.0, released October 27. After an initial setup cost exceeding $100,000, each subsequent Firefox exploit cost approximately $1,000 and the fastest completed in 12 hours. A comparable effort against Chrome failed after roughly $100,000 spent. Anthropic had previously published a report arguing that GLM-5.3 is the first comparably capable AI model released without meaningful safeguards, citing its own testing in which the model autonomously found multiple zero-days in a browser's JavaScript engine and chained them into a working exploit within a day. NIST CAISI benchmark data placed GLM-5.3 as the most cyber-capable open-weight model measured, recording 50 of 410 ExploitBench end-to-end exploits and 4% full control-flow hijacks on an OSS-Fuzz binary set where Opus 4.6 and GLM-5.2 scored zero; safeguard-bypass rates ranged from 64% to 100% depending on attack method. The same data placed GLM-5.3 roughly four months behind U.S. frontier systems in overall cyber capability. Zhipu's Zixuan Li pointed to the model's free OpenVuln security service as a defensive contribution. Researcher Nathan Lambert challenged what he described as Anthropic's implicit open-dangerous/closed-safe framing, arguing that both open and closed frontier models can be unsafe and that open weights power defensive tools such as Glasswing.
How it developed
Epoch AI research on GLM 5.3 Firefox patch-gap exploitation published
NIST CAISI benchmark data and Nathan Lambert's critique of Anthropic's open/closed framing reported
Anthropic published research report arguing GLM-5.3 enables attackers to find and exploit zero-days without meaningful restrictions
Sources
1 more source
- Anthropic's GLM-5.3 exploit capability report
- The open-weight versus closed AI model gap
- OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Cyber and Daybreak program
- OpenAI's Patch the Planet Links AI Security Research to Open-Source Fixes
BackgroundFrontier models, open models, and how they are compared
Get the daily email
When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.
One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.
Check your email.
I have sent you a confirmation link. One click and you are in.
Not in your inbox? Look in spam or promotions. If it's there, mark it "Not spam" so future editions land in your inbox.