A 404 Media investigation tracked a bulk order of approximately 1,000 books, purchased on Biblio by an anonymous buyer, to the VGT3 operation inside Amazon's LAS8 warehouse in Las Vegas, where workers destructively scan books for AI training data. Amazon workers confirmed in online forums that VGT3 handles large-scale destructive scanning. The warehouse entrance displayed a logo of a Tyrannosaurus rex preparing to devour a book. Amazon stated it purchases books through commercial channels to help develop and improve the products and services its customers use, without addressing the AI training connection.
Court documents from a lawsuit by book authors against Anthropic separately revealed Project Panama, whose stated goal was to acquire books from commercial bookselling marketplaces, cut their spines, and scan them for AI training data. Internal documents described a goal to 'destructively scan all the books in the world,' with plans to scan between 500,000 and 2 million books under a single six-month vendor contract. Anthropic used a hydraulic cutting machine to remove pages before scanning with industrial-grade equipment. A judge ruled the practice constituted fair use in part because destroying the original physical copy prevents duplication or resale.
Bulk orders from sellers in the US, UK, and Europe have been reported since at least 2024, ranging from 1,000 to one million books per order. ISBNdb advertises bulk book sourcing for AI buyers while keeping buyer identities anonymous. Pre-2022 books are valued because they are free of AI-generated content. Forbes reported that AI companies buy physical copies rather than pirated digital archives to avoid copyright lawsuits, with physical ownership interpreted as entitling buyers to scan and destroy books. The cheapest scanning method involves feeding book spines into wood chippers and discarding torn-out pages after scanning. Ars Technica reported concern that the practice may be happening on a larger scale than currently known and that some rare physical copies may be lost permanently.
Elon Musk stated 'Every collection is important' in a statement about xAI, but Ars Technica reported that Musk did not rule out destroying books and that it is unclear how xAI defines 'rare.' Critics noted that scanning does not require physical destruction; one commentator was quoted as saying 'Destroying books is uncool' and suggested that tech companies 'could build a new library next to their book-scanning facilities for the cost of a few GPUs.'